to V.

If we only think of “English”, I will agree with you. There is less chance that you misunderstand something that is written in English to compare to me. But people couldn’t say that you, who are a native speaker, can understand anything written in English. Can you understand any avant-garde literature written in English? Can you understand any theory of math written in English? Can you understand any political essays written in English? I mean that we have the same chance to misunderstand the contents if you are as stupid as I am.



You wrote this;



I am not sure why everyone is so interested in CLONING. Perhaps it is the question of whether or not human clones will have SOULS. I consider such a thing as a superstition. The soul is created by a thinking mind. If a clone thinks it will have a soul.



And I answered this;



A cloned human is just one of twins but he/she was born later. It means that a cloned human is exactly the same as a human being.



Would you say that I misunderstood what you wrote? Actually “A cloned human is just one of twins but he/she is born later.” is an accomplished fact. So your question, whether of not human clones will have SOUL, doesn’t relay to this time my theme at all.



I think your writing is very interesting and I agree with you when I consider only “SOUL”. I think SOUL itself is a superstition. Humans and cloned humans have the same souls and even other animals or insects have the same souls. At the same time, we could say that anything doesn’t have souls. Every thing is the same creature. We must ask this question, --- The “SOUL” itself exists or not?